What Underachieving
Middle School Students
Believe Motivates them to Learn

Chapter 1: The Challenge to Educate Everyone

Chapter 2: A Review of Literature

Chapter 3: Methods
     Overview
     Participant Selection
     Data Collection
       Student Interviews
       Observations
       Teacher Interviews
       Maine Aspirations
     Data Analysis 

Chapter 4: The Results

Chapter 5: Discussion

References

Appendixes

Biography

Data Collection

This study is a "theory building" study designed to explore what students think. Erikson (1986) noted that interpretive designs are used when research takes place in natural settings and researchers want to know more about meaning-making and the points of view of particular people in particular settings. Therefore, it makes sense to work from the perspective of grounded theory and other inductive approaches (Spradley, 1980).

[Grounded theory is] inductively derived from the study of the phenomenon it represents.... [I]t is discovered, developed, and provisionally verified through systematic data collection and analysis... Therefore, data collection, analysis, and theory stand in reciprocal relationship with each other. One does not begin with a theory, then prove it. Rather, one begins with an area of study and what is relevant to that study is allowed to emerge. (Strauss and Corbin, 1990, p. 23)

This kind of research, specifically grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Strauss & Corbin, 1990), requires qualitative methods of data gathering and analysis. The core data for this study comes from student interviews. Confidence in that data comes from careful attention to the accuracy of the data collected and from triangulating data to other methods, sources, and investigators (Stake, 1994; Janesick, 1994; Lincoln & Guba, 1986; Glesne & Peshkin, 1992; and Bogdan & Biklen, 1998). "Without subjects’ quotes to enrich and confirm researchers’ analyses, or interobserver cross-checking to lend greater credence to their representations, some observers have had difficulty legitimating their work to a scholarly audience" (Adler & Adler, 1994, p. 381). The credibility of the participants’ expressed views will be validated by triangulating interview data with classroom observations, teacher interviews, and quantitative data from the Maine Aspirations Benchmarking Initiative.

Web site created by Mike Muir
Send questions or comments
to
wilder@somtel.com
Last updated April 25, 2001
Mike Muir
Assistant Professor of Education
University of Maine at Farmington
104 Main Street
Farmington, ME 04938
207.778.7179
wilder@somtel.com
http://violet.umf.maine.edu/~mmuir