1-to-1 Learning with Laptop Evaluation

A Model for Successful
1-to-1 Learning with Laptop Initiatives
 

The MLLS evaluation team uses a success-based approach to evaluation. We use the research base and the experience of large scale educational technology initiatives to move beyond the question of whether technology can improve student learning to using the idenetified conditions and strategies for using technology which do improve the quality of a school's instructional program as a benchmark for evaluation. Doing so, the MLLS evaluation team can provide critical formative assessment to local project leaders about what they are doing well, what challenges they face, and can make recommendations on how to address the challenges.

The MLLS evaluation plan is based on a success model for  1-to-1 learning with laptop initiatives pictured below. The model illustrated below expands on the list of essential strategies for success within Maine's learning with laptop initiative.

The leaders of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative (MLTI - http://www.mainelearns.org/), the first statewide learning with laptop initiative, has been working since 2001 with 240 middle schools across Maine. Some have demonstrated more success than others and MLTI staff have identified strategies (http://moore.portlandschools.org/ibook/strategy_links.html) which have contributed significantly to the success in those schools and which can be identified as missing in less successful schools. The success strategies fall into five categories: vision and goal setting; leadership; professional development; technical support; and procedures and policies.

Image of a Model for Evaluating 1-to-1 Laptop InitiativesThe success model here acknowledges evidence of learning as the desired outcome and recognizes two critical components for success: teacher practice and leadership; and four  supportive but necessary components: professional development, technology access, funding, and partnerships.

Download a PDF of this success model (64 KB).

The model presented here adds a system map to reflect how the various components relate to each other. Indicators for each of the seven components are also provided to help guide the evaluation process. The model also recognizes that not all of these components are of the same level of importance to the success of the project.

The two most important factors are  the quality of the teacher's practice, and the quality of the leadership of the learning with laptop initiative. MLTI has identified leadership as the single most important factor to the success of the implementation of a learning with laptop initiative. The vision and expectations, set by the principal and project leadership team, set the tone of the project and are critical for teachers to effectively begin to integrate the technology into their teaching and the students' learning. 

Further, the most significant aspect of this evaluation is the focus on teaching and learning. Analyzing over 700 studies, Schacter (1995) concludes that technology initiatives have to focus on teaching and learning, not the technology, in order to be successful: "One of the enduring difficulties about technology and education is that a lot of people think about the technology first and the education later" (Schacter, 1995, p. 11). Studies that show a negative impact of technology often indicates that the initiatives themselves focused on hardware and software, or teachers taught about the technology instead of using the technology to enhance learning experiences. Further, Does Technology Improve Student Achievement? (Educational Research Service, 2001) states, "…The true value of technology for learning lies not in learning to use technology, but in using technology to learn."  Teacher practices is the most critical component to the initiative's impact on students.

 


 

The 1-to-1 Advocate

1-to-1 Evaluation

MLLS Home

MLTI

MLLS Research Briefs

   

 

 

Maine Learning with Laptop Studies

The Maine Learning
with Laptop Studies

is a project of the

Maine Center for
Meaningful Engaged Learning

in collaboration with

The Institute for the Integration of
Technology Into Teaching and Learning

 

Maine Center for
Meaningful Engaged Learning

University of Maine at Farmington
252 Main St.
Farmington, ME 04938

MCMEL LogoUMF Logo

http://www.mcmel.org

Mike Muir, Director
mmuir@maine.edu
207-778-7179

Inservice Available

 

The Institute for the Integration of
Technology Into Teaching and Learning

University of North Texas
Matthews Hall Rm. 316
1300 Highland Ave.
Denton, TX 76203

The Institute for the Integration of Technology Into Teaching and Learning

http://www.iittl.unt.edu/

Gerald Knezek, Director
gknezek@gmail.com
940-565-2057

Rhonda Christensen, Associate Director
rhonda.christensen@gmail.com

Created by Mike Muir

Last updated:
May 10, 2006