Teacher Questionnaire Sets
Note: this site is underdevelopment
and each of the individual surveys will be added to the site.
This set of surveys and questionnaires will
provide evaluators with comprehensive data. The entire set can be
administered in under an hour.
Demographics
Teacher Demographics - Typical
questions about grade level taught, gender, subjects taught,
experience, etc. These questions are usually customized to the
individual client.
Teaching, Instruction, & Learning
Teachers improve achievement, not
laptops. Certainly computers can be one of teachers' powerful tools for
reaching students. The instrument sets below will help evaluators
assess the teaching and learning at the school, not to judge the
teachers, but to provide valuable feedback to validate and improve
practice.
Engaging Teaching Questionnaire -
Muir identified 9 Essential Elements for meaningful engaged learning,
especially for reaching hard to teach students. This survey looks at
how teacher implement each of those elements. Developed by Mike Muir at
the Maine Center for Meaningful Engaged Learning at the University of
Maine at Farmington. Based on McMEL's model for meaningful engaged
learning: http://www.mcmel.org/engaged.html.
For more information, email mmuir@maine.edu
Teaching Philosophy - Becker (2000 - http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/ ) found that teachers who tended toward a "constructivist"
philosophy were more successful at integrating technology into their
teaching. This survey will help categorize teachers' philosophies.
Adapted from the Teaching Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey
(H. Becker, University of California, Irvine, and R. Anderson,
University of Minnesota, Principal Investigators). Available at http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/questionnaires.html
Teacher Efficacy Scale - Bandura and
others have shown that teacher self efficacy, their beliefs about
whether they can help hard to teach children learn, will predict how
successful they actually are at helping those children achieve (see http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/self-efficacy.html). Ten item "short form" Likert instrument focusing on
teacher efficacy. In Hoy, W.K. & Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Teachers'
sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The
Elementary School Journal 93, 356-372.
Teacher Technology Attitude
Teacher Attitude Toward Computers Questionnaire - Christensen and Knezek have shown that teachers'
attitudute toward technology, combined with their skill level, can
predict up to 15% percent of achievement. Teachers' Attitudes Toward
Computers Questionnaire (TAC 3.2a) is a 105-item Likert/Semantic
Differential Instrument for measuring teachers' attitudes toward
computers on 7 subscales. Available at http://www.iittl.unt.edu/IITTL/publications/studies2b/ (click on "Research Instruments" then click on "TAC")
Technology Access & Support
Teacher Technology Access and
Support - Questions looking at access and use of technology at
school and at home, as well as questions about how well they perceive
the equipment works and is maintained, and how they help their students
learn new technology skills. Portions created by MLLS. Others adapted
from the Teaching Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey (H.
Becker, University of California, Irvine, and R. Anderson, University
of Minnesota, Principal Investigators). Available at http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/questionnaires.html. Other portions adapted from the "NeedSnap Survey"
published in Equity and Diversity in K-12 Applications of Information
Technology: KIDS Project Findings for 2000-2001 by Drs. Rhonda
Christensen & Gerald Knezek. Available online at http://www.iittl.unt.edu/KIDS2001/index.htm.
Technology Use and Proficiency
How effective teachers are at
improving learning by integrating technology depends, in part, on their
own comfort with, skill at, and level of use of technology.
Teacher Technology Use - Surveys
looking at frequency of technology use at home and at school. Survey
adapted from Technology Acceptance and Use Survey developed by Basham,
J. D., & Ching, C. (2004) as part of the Technology Integration
Complexity Model. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. For more
information email jbasham@uiuc.edu.
Teacher Technology Proficiency - A
self report of perceived ability to use various applications. The
Student Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment was adapted from the
Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment created by Dr. Margaret Merlyn
Ropp. For additional information or for permission to use the TPSA in
other studies, e-mail megropp@mivu.org.
Stages of Adoption - From:
Christensen, R. (1997). Effect of technology integration education on
the attitudes of teachers and their students. Doctoral dissertation,
Univ. of North Texas. Based on Russell, A. L. (1995) Stages in learning
new technology. Computers in Education, 25(4), 173-178. Available at http://courseweb.tac.unt.edu/rhondac/research/dissert/appc.htm.
Levels of Use -
Griffin, D. and Christensen, R. (1999). Concerns-Based Adoption Model
(CBAM) Levels of Use of an Innovation (CBAM-LOU). Denton, Texas:
Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning.
Available at http://www.iittl.unt.edu/pt3II/WordFiles/cbam.doc [Word Document]
Professional Development
Teacher Professional Development
- Addresses a teacher's satisfaction with technology related
professional development offerings, extent of participation in
professional development opportunities, and types of professional
discussions and interactions. Portions created by MLLS and others
adapted from Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey
(H. Becker, University of California, Irvine, and R. Anderson,
University of Minnesota, Principal Investigators - Available at http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/questionnaires.html).
Leadership
Leadership Teacher Questionnaire
- Measures teachers' persections about their administration's advocacy
& support; vision building and setting; understanding of learning
and teaching with technology; and policies and procedures. A MLLS
Questionnaire.
|
|
|

The Maine Learning
with Laptop Studies
is a project of the
Maine Center for
Meaningful Engaged Learning
in collaboration with
The Institute for the
Integration of
Technology Into Teaching and Learning
|
|
Maine Center for
Meaningful Engaged Learning
University of Maine at Farmington
252 Main St.
Farmington, ME 04938
  
http://www.mcmel.org
Mike Muir, Director
mmuir@maine.edu
207-778-7179
Inservice Available
|
|
The Institute for the
Integration of
Technology Into Teaching and Learning
University of North Texas
Matthews Hall Rm. 316
1300 Highland Ave.
Denton, TX 76203

http://www.iittl.unt.edu/
Gerald Knezek, Director
gknezek@gmail.com
940-565-2057
Rhonda Christensen, Associate Director
rhonda.christensen@gmail.com
|
Created by Mike Muir
Last updated:
April 2, 2005
|
|